Current Issue: February 10, 2012 Next Issue: March 2, 2012
|
David Poopalapillai is angry. On Oct. 21 the Conservative government introduced Bill C-49, the Act Preventing Human Smugglers from Abusing Canada's Immigration System. The spokesperson for the Canadian Tamil Congress speaks quickly and cuttingly about what it will mean for some refugees.
“Do we expect a woman who was raped or facing persecution to go to an embassy, submit an application, wait there for three years and expect her to be raped by whoever in that time then come to Canada?” he asks, his accent thickening. Minister of Public Safety Vic Toews introduced the bill after two boatloads of Tamil asylum seekers arrived from Sri Lanka via Thailand over the past 12 months. He stood in front of the Ocean Lady, one of the two ships, on a dock in B.C. flanked by Citizenship and Immigration Minister Jason Kenney and Regional Minister Stockwell Day, when he made the announcement.
“We are providing a strong deterrent for those who are considering using human smuggling operations to jump the queue into Canada,” Toews said. “We are ensuring the integrity and fairness of Canada's immigration system for years to come.”
Queue jumping In international law the first country an asylum seeker arrives in after leaving home is where he or she must seek refuge. The two Tamil boats stopped in Thailand before arriving in B.C. Poopalapillai disagrees. “There is no queue jumping for refugees. The queue starts right in Canada."
Canada offers resettlement through the UN High Commission for Refugees. Asylum seekers wait in camps or in a third country to be accepted into Canada as landed immigrant About 33,000 refugees claim asylum in Canada each year. In 2009, 12,000 of the 22,000 accepted refugees arrived through government and private sponsorships. Combined, the number of people aboard the two Tamil ships is less than the number of refugees that arrive in Canada any given week. He says diminished access can convince refugees to rely on the expertise of smugglers and has the potential to make trafficking humans more lucrative than trafficking narcotics. Milner questions the government’s intentions, given the timing of the bill and what he describes as its inability to curtail human smuggling. “The fact that this new bill has been introduced so soon after the successful negotiation of Bill C-11 smacks of political opportunism,” he says. Bill C-11 was a complete overhaul of asylum laws in Canada and was passed earlier this year with the assent of opposition parties. It’s a diversion, it’s a political gimmick, nothing else, nothing more. — David PoopalapillaiPoopalapillai says the government is using C-49 to divert attention away from a series of recent challenges, including the loss of its bid for a seat on the United Nations Security Council. “It’s a diversion, it’s a political gimmick, nothing else, nothing more,” he says. “What we have seen is the significant public erosion of sympathy and solidarity [for refugees]” he says. Targeting refugees Charbonneau says that with the bill “Canada is taking action to stop abuse of our generosity by bolstering Canada's ability to revoke the ‘protected person’ status of immigration fraudsters who arrive as part of a human smuggling operation." Gary Anandasangaree, a Toronto lawyer and legal counsel for the Canadian Tamil Congress, says the government has completely failed to acknowledge potential legitimate refugee claims; instead it will view claims through the prism of human smuggling. He says the issues of human smuggling and asylum should be separate. Anandasangaree says that the law also creates a two-tiered model for considering refugees — those who are irregulars with limited rights and those who come to the country through government sponsored resettlement programs. Janet Dench with the Canadian Council for Refugees says that violates basic principles of fairness and that the law, if passed, would allow the government to deprive one group of refugees of their rights. “This is an extremely anti-refugee bill,” she says. “These are people who are seeking protection against persecution and mass human rights violations,” Milner says. “The fundamental desire of the human spirit to survive will lead them to continue to try and find a solution. Restrictive policies just drive them further underground as opposed to prevent their arrival at all.” |
Bill C-49 vs. International law
International law experts are looking into the legalities of Bill C-49 compared with the 1951 UN Convention for the Status of Refugees, which Canada signed. Bill C-49: One-year detention without trial.
Bill C-49: Travel ban on refugees
Bill C-49: Five year hold on citizenship application
Bill C-49: Allows the minister to deem arrival an irregular arrival
Key Definitions
Refugee: Any person, according to the 1951 UN Convention, who has a well-founded fear of persecution because of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinions and is outside his/her country of nationality and cannot go back for fear of persecution and seeks the protection of another country. Resettlement: The term used by Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) to describe the legal process of bringing a refugee to Canada to live as a permanent resident. Source: UNHCR & CIC |
The buck should stop right at its source where there are gross human rights violations. Canada ought to do something in a more positive direction and call for better governance and an end to impunity and malgovernance. Same time something had to be done to end human smuggling.