Current Issue: March 30, 2012 Next Issue: Sept. 28, 2012
|
With talk of eliminating the penny picking up, some economists are saying the government should go further and eliminate the nickel as well. In December, the Senate Standing Committee on National Finance recommended the one-cent piece be eliminated. With an Angus Reid poll showing 55 per cent of adult Canadians support getting rid of the coin, the penny’s days seem numbered.
But this doesn't go far enough say two leading economists, Jean-Pierre Aubry, an economist with Desjardins Group in Ottawa and John Palmer, the so-called godfather of the ban-the-penny movement. “It makes sense to round to the nearest decimal,” says Palmer.
“You’ll have to do it anyways,” says Aubry adding that the nickel has joined the penny as being almost worthless. Canada is behind other countries and should have eliminated the penny in the 1980s, according to a study by Aubry and the Desjardins Group in 2008. The study recommends getting rid of the penny as soon as possible, and then removing the nickel a few years after. Both the penny and nickel have lost much of their value, wth prices increasing by 20 times since the coins were introduced in 1908. Aubry adds that handling small coins costs the economy hundreds of millions of dollars each year. The fear of inflation Getting rid of coins is dealing with the symptom and not the problem, says David Howden, an economist at the Madrid campus of St. Louis University in MIssouri. He says the real issue is that inflation is too high and suggests that keeping the coins around will encourage the Bank of Canada to keep inflation lower. “If there is a problem where prices rise and old denominations are not so useful, we should not shoot the messenger,” he says.If the nickel were removed, all cash purchases would be rounded to the nearest decimal ... this would also give the government a chance to fix other problems with the coinage system. He argues that removing coins from circulation won’t actually cause inflation, as some have suggested. “This should have been out of public debate 15 years ago,” he says. Both the Senate finance committee and the Desjardins Group study recommend the government set clear guidelines for how to round prices. Palmer says stores wouldn’t even need to change their displayed prices, and could simply round purchases at the check-out. A five-year gap While both Palmer and Aubry admit the two coins could be eliminated at the same time, they say a period of about five years in between would be best. New Zealand waited almost 20 years, getting rid of its five-cent piece in 2006. Once Canadians see there’s no problem with removing the penny, taking the nickel out of circulation will be easier, Aubry says.
If the nickel were removed, all cash purchases would be rounded to the nearest decimal. Both Palmer and Aubry say this would also give the government a chance to fix other problems with the coinage system. This includes replacing the quarter with a 20-cent coin and possibly adding a 50-cent coin, both of which could be smaller and lighter than current coins. This change wouldn’t be without costs, however. Kim Lockie, president of the Canadian Automatic Merchandising Association, suggested in his testimony before the Senate committee in September that the nickel be removed at the same time as the penny. But, he added, it would represent a cost for vending machine owners. “It will cost our industry a fair bit, and we do not receive any help from anywhere,” he told the committee. He said the cost would be entirely from having to change machines over to the new coins. However, he said this change is inevitable, and it would be cheaper to do it all at the same time. This is not the first time Canada has talked about removing lower currency. A private member's bill to remove the penny was put forward in 2008.
|
The cost of small coins
$130 million per year: Estimated cost of penny circulation in Canada $4: Approximate cost per person 1,826.23 per cent: Total inflation in Canada since 1914 1908: Year the penny and nickel were introduced in Canada $400 per year: Approximate Canadian income per capita in 1908 $35,000: Approximate income per capita in 2007 20 cents: What you would pay now for something that cost a penny 1908 96 cents: What you would pay now for something that cost a nickel in 1914 Source: Bank of Canada; Desjardins Economic Study, 2007 The Nickel Question: New Zealand
New Zealand got rid of its nickel in 2006. The main reasons cited were:
Source: Desjardins Economic Study, "Should we stop using the penny?" February 2007 Senate Study
In 2010, the Senate Committee on National Finance examined removing the penny. The committee released its findings in early December. Several study witnesses recommended also removing the nickel, but the committee's mandate was solely to look at the penny. The committee's recommended that:
Source: Senate of Canada |